Thanks for your feedback!

Yes, these theories seem like a way forward in our understanding of the Universe. However, I must warn you that the “truth” is a bit more profound. Ultimately, seeking a definite “model” for understanding the Universe is like trying to decide which “interface” is more “true” between Windows, Linux or MacOS… :-)

I guess you see my point.

There is no real “true” model, there are only models which allow us to experience an Infinite Pure Potential in a certain way.

As more people “believed” in a Newtonian Universe, that allowed us to set off the industrial revolution and the boom of “mechanics”, as more people “believed” in a Universe more complex thanks to Maxwell, Planck, Einstein, Tesla and the likes, that allowed us to move to the boom of electricity, electronics and nuclear power. As more people believe in “quantum” physics, that will enable us to move beyond the strict “materialist” view of the Universe…

And so the real question is not what is true so much as what does a specific model allow you to “do”. Just like when you compare operating systems. You don’t rank them by order of “truthfulness”, but by what you want to do with them. And that is a profound difference. In essence, we are at a point in our history where we can finally consciously choose which direction evolution should take us, as opposed to letting “natural selection” do it for us. Basically, randomly choosing a new “model” (that of Haramein, or Ginzburg, or other new theories like that of the electric universe by Wallace Thornhill, or the E8 lattice and 8 dimensions theory from the Quantum Gravity Research team…) and seeing if whatever experience derives from it allows us to survive, consciously choosing one of the models not based on which one is more true, but which one is more likely to help us survive and not destroy ourselves… It’s a bit like if a dinosaur could make a conscious choice between growing longer fangs, stronger legs or thicker armor…

I hope you understand what I mean by this…