Hi Paul! Yes, one take away is definitely that we should find a system where each person can contribute what they are best/good at, and what they like.

What I found most interesting in this theory, is that it doesn’t exclude any theory. It reconciles religion with science and shows how both narratives can be accurate. Also, it “blends” in nicely with my story number 3, “the nature of reality”, where I argue that reality is just an “interface” that we create to interact with pure energy, which means that at every single point in time, we give pure energy a certain form, but that form is determined by what we believe the “past” looks like, since that’s the “rules” of the game as we have designed it.

As for being story tellers, we are already. It’s just that it’s in our best interest to narrate a story which is infinitely long rather than one where we auto destruct. Because ultimately, we can’t say “I don’t want to tell a story”. We are all the time telling a story. Every second we breathe, every thought we “catch”, formulate out loud and act upon. If you’re not a story teller, then you’re dead. And even when you’re dead, you keep on telling a story, the story of what happens when you die, hahaha…

That’s probably why reality exists. It cannot not exist just as you cannot not think. The moment you think anything, it is created. Maybe not in THIS reality, but in some reality somewhere. So we may as well gain mastery over that “power”, rather than let us use it passively and have it backfire all the time…