“Bona fide science”… You mean the one used to prove smoking is safe in the mid 20th century? Or the one over the toxicity of DDT? Bona fide science exists ONLY when there aren’t multi billion dollar business interests at stake, and when the individual has an open mind for changing their models (unlike you given your writing). You are to science today what the Newtonians were to Einstein 100 years ago: poking fun at his ideas and ridiculing him for not being “scientific". So sure, keep your limited materialist mainstream dark matter nonsense model, but don’t expect others to fall for it via your attempt at manipulating others with the white blouse effect: “shut up, I’m a scientist, the rest is conspiracy".